Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More

A TALE OF TWO PERVERTS AND HOW ELITIST EDITORS AT STARS AND STRIPES PUT STAFF SGT PHOTO ON PAGE ONE BUT "DOWN-PLAYED" EVEN WORSE CASE OF WEST POINT GRAD, JAG OFFICER, MAJ DAN WOOLVERTON, WHO USED INFANT SON IN CHILD PORN PRODUCTION - WHY IS "BABYSITTER" SICKO JOSHUA SMITH MORE DESERVING OF HEADLINES? "RANK HAS ITS PRIVILEGES" THEY SAY, BUT THIS IS RIDICULOUS

Air Force Staff Sgt. Joshua Smith is a low life scum. We have the utmost contempt for child molesters, and this guy needs to look over his shoulder for the rest of his life at the Leavenworth DB, in case another inmate decides to shank him in the shower room. But skinhead sex criminal, MAJ Dan Woolverton, deserves the big headlines at STARS AND STRIPES, not some NCO.

We wonder why the elitist and out-of-touch editors at STRIPES decided to give Smith the full PAGE ONE treatment, while "downplaying" coverage of an even worse case - that of a West Point graduate and JAG officer - who used his three-month old infant son in a homemade child-porn production?

Smith was nabbed for molesting tots he "babysat" at Ramstein AFB in Germany. He deserves everything he gets. But why is it an Air Force NCO rates front page coverage while Woolverton's story is given kids glove treatment? We didn't hesitate to give it splash-play and were the only media outlet to publish both Woolverton's USMA graduation pix and police mug photo.

It would seem that the major, precisely because he graduated from the U.S. Military Academy and sent others to jail for the crimes he committed, ought to go to Leavenworth himself, instead of the country club minimum security lockup in North Carolina where financial swindler Bernie Madoff whiles away his days.
"DIFFERENT SPANKS FOR DIFFERENT RANKS"
AT ONCE-RESPECTED STARS AND STRIPES
As we've pointed out with the Jill Metzger cover-up and payoff, if she hadn't been an officer so well-connected, had an OSI "husband," a retired colonel "daddy," and strange relationship with a four-star general who did somersaults to save her "100% disabled" hide, she might have been court-martialed like an enlisted person.

The Smith case is a blatant example of how the DOD-funded STRIPES seems to discriminate according to rank. "Different spanks for different ranks" is a well known phrase among enlisted members, but "politically-correct" editors on this so-called objective newspaper sure do seem to tend to favor officers over non-coms and EM when it comes to adverse news coverage. Why is it that more and more of their readers are turning to MilitaryCorruption.com to get the unvarnished and uncensored truth about what is really going on in the U.S. military?

We don't suck up to the Pentagon or the politicians. We blast the Democrats as often as we did the Republicans when Bush was in power. One would think STRIPES would wake up to the fact their readership is a lot better educated than the average WWII G.I. They can't be fooled. We know that, from the huge volume of e-mail we get.

Let's try and show a little more fairness in news coverage, editors. Your readers deserve it.

0 comments:

Post a Comment

 
Design by Free WordPress Themes | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premium Blogger Themes | Blogger Templates